Lesson 3 of 8

What Proof Do You Have That Anyone Wants This?

Waitlists and polite feedback are not proof. Learn the evidence ladder investors actually use, and how to climb it in a week for under 100 dollars.

9 min read

What proof do you have that anyone wants this? This is the question that kills most early pitches, and it usually kills them in the first five minutes. The founder answers with enthusiasm, a waitlist number, and a story about how everyone they showed it to loved it. The investor nods, asks two more questions out of politeness, and passes. Not because the idea is bad, but because nothing in that answer was evidence. You covered the problem in lesson one and the market in lesson two. This lesson is the center of the course, because this is the question where the money actually decides.

Why 'people loved it' counts for nothing

Investors apply a politeness discount to everything you tell them about feedback, and the discount is close to 100 percent. Your friends love your idea because they love you. Strangers you pitched at a meetup said it sounds cool because that is the fastest way to end the conversation. Even genuine enthusiasm is cheap: saying I would totally use that costs the speaker nothing, so it proves nothing. Investors have heard people loved it from a thousand founders whose products later launched to silence.

Waitlist numbers get discounted almost as hard, and founders find this genuinely unfair until they think it through. An email address is free to give. The person typing it has no idea what your product costs, has committed nothing, and in most cases will never open your launch email. Most waitlists convert to paid at rates so low that a big signup number tells an investor mostly one thing: you are good at collecting emails. That is a marketing skill, not proof of demand.

The common thread is cost. Words are free, emails are nearly free, and evidence starts where cost begins. The question an investor is silently asking behind this question is: what did a stranger give up to get closer to your product? If the answer is nothing, you have anecdotes. If the answer is money, time, or reputation, you have something to talk about.

  • Compliments from people who know you: worthless as evidence, discount to zero.
  • Survey answers about future behavior: people are terrible at predicting what they will pay for.
  • Free waitlist signups: weak signal, heavily discounted, useful mainly as a pool to test on.
  • Enthusiasm in demos you ran: you were in the room selling. It does not count.

The evidence ladder

Rank every piece of demand evidence by one test: how much did it cost the person to produce it, and did they produce it without you in the room? At the top of the ladder sit costly actions by strangers. A stranger who clicked a button that said 99 a month, knowing the price, wanted the thing more than they wanted to keep browsing. A stranger who walked through a fake door flow, or pre-ordered, or put down a deposit, gave up money or effort. These people were not being polite. They did not know you. That is what makes them proof.

One rung down is measured conversion from cold traffic. Not raw clicks, conversion: out of this many strangers who saw a clear offer at a clear price, this fraction acted. A rate from cold traffic is honest because the audience did not arrive pre-warmed by your network. It also comes with a denominator, which is what separates a number from an anecdote. Fifty signups means nothing on its own. Fifty signups from 900 cold visitors is a rate an investor can reason about.

The bottom rung that still counts is repeated organic complaint volume: strangers in communities describing your exact problem, in their own words, over and over, without being prompted. It is weaker than a costly action because complaining is free, but it is real because nobody complains recreationally about client onboarding paperwork. Below this rung is everything else, and everything else should stay out of your pitch.

  • Rung 1: strangers taking a costly action. Clicking a priced CTA, completing a fake door flow, pre-ordering, paying a deposit.
  • Rung 2: measured conversion from cold traffic. A rate with a denominator, from people you did not know.
  • Rung 3: repeated organic complaints. The same pain, in the same words, from unconnected strangers in public.
  • Not on the ladder: friends, surveys, demo enthusiasm, and waitlist totals without a conversion story.

Get real proof this week for under 100 dollars

The good news is that top-of-ladder evidence is cheap to generate. A landing page smoke test is the workhorse. Build a one-page site that sells the product as if it exists: the problem, the promise, a real price, and a call to action that implies commitment, like Start free trial or Get started for 99 a month. Behind the button, be honest: a page that says the product is launching soon, here is where you are on the list, and optionally a way to pre-order or book a call. Put 50 to 80 dollars of ads from Reddit, Meta, or Google in front of the audience you claim wants this, and measure who clicks the priced button.

A fake door test is the same idea aimed at a single feature or offer, and it works inside communities without ad spend. Post where your audience already gathers, describe the thing plainly, and link to the page. The door is fake because the product is not built yet. The measurement is real because the people walking through it are strangers acting on their own interest. When they hit the honest reveal, tell them the truth and offer them the list or a discount. Most people respect it, and the ones who get annoyed were never going to pay anyway.

Two rules keep the test honest. First, set your pass and fail numbers before you launch, exactly as in lesson one, or you will squint at any result until it looks like a yes. Second, keep the price on the page. A smoke test without a price is a compliment machine: you will get clicks from people who would never pay, and you will learn nothing an investor cares about. The price is the whole point. It is what turns a click into a costly action.

  • Day 1-2: write the page. One problem, one promise, one real price, one CTA that implies commitment.
  • Day 3: launch 50-80 dollars of cold ads at your claimed audience, or post the fake door in 2-3 communities.
  • Day 4-6: let it run. Do not touch the page mid-test or your rate means nothing.
  • Day 7: count. Visitors, priced-CTA clicks, emails left after seeing the price, pre-orders or booked calls.
  • Decide against the pass/fail line you wrote down before launch, not the one you wish you had written.

Which numbers to say in the pitch, and which to keep quiet

Not every result deserves airtime. As a rough rule of thumb, cold-traffic conversion to a priced action in the low single digits is normal for a new offer, and a rate meaningfully above that, roughly 5 percent or better, is worth repeating out loud. Below 1 percent, stay quiet and fix the offer or the audience before you pitch, because volunteering a weak rate does more damage than saying you are still testing. Pre-orders and deposits are different: state them as absolute counts, because any stranger paying for a product that does not exist yet is remarkable at this stage. Seven pre-orders sounds small until the investor remembers what it took to get them.

The answer format is two sentences: what you put in front of strangers, and what fraction of them took a costly action. We put a priced landing page in front of N cold visitors from [where], and X percent clicked the [price] plan; Y of them pre-ordered. That is the whole answer. No adjectives, no waitlist total, no quote from a friend. It lands because it is falsifiable, and because the investor can hear that you already think in experiments, which is a signal about you, not just the idea.

This is also exactly the artifact a validation run in Olune's /validate is built to produce: a priced test in front of cold traffic, with the conversion math done for you and an honest read on whether the number clears the bar. However you generate it, walk into the room with a denominator. The founders who get funded at this stage are rarely the ones with the biggest waitlist. They are the ones whose evidence survives the politeness discount.

Worked example

Maya's answer, before and after a 68 dollar test

Maya's first draft answer to the question was the one investors hear every week: 'We have 412 people on our waitlist, and every agency owner I have shown Clientfile to says onboarding paperwork is a nightmare. The response has been incredible.' An investor hears three claims and discounts all three. The waitlist cost nothing to join. The agency owners were talking to the person who built the thing. Incredible is an adjective, not a number.

So she ran a one-week smoke test. She built a single page selling Clientfile as if it existed: automate your client onboarding paperwork, 99 a month, with a Start free trial button. Behind the button, an honest reveal, a launch list, and an option to pre-pay the first month at half price. She spent 68 dollars on Reddit ads targeted at marketing agency subreddits and posted a fake door link in two Slack communities where agency owners gather, disclosing it to the moderators first.

The result: 287 cold visitors, 26 clicked the priced button, 14 left a work email after seeing the reveal, and 5 pre-paid. Her answer now reads: 'We put a 99-a-month landing page in front of 287 cold visitors from agency communities. 9 percent clicked the priced plan and 5 strangers pre-paid for a product that does not exist yet.' Same founder, same idea, one week and 68 dollars later. Only one of these answers survives the first five minutes.

Learn by doing

Paste these into ChatGPT or Claude and run them against your own idea. The model will answer happily. Olune goes further and checks the answer against real Reddit threads, competitor maps, and keyword volume.

Prompt 1 · Design a one-week smoke test for your idea, with pass/fail numbers set in advance.

My idea: [describe it in two sentences]. My target customer: [who they are and where they gather online]. The price I believe they would pay: [price]. Design a landing page smoke test I can run in one week for under 100 dollars. Give me: the page's headline and one-line promise, the exact CTA wording with the price visible, where to spend the ad budget or which communities to post a fake door link in, what to measure, and the specific pass and fail numbers I should commit to before launch.

What a good output looks like

For Clientfile it proposes the headline 'Client onboarding paperwork, done before the kickoff call', a CTA of 'Start free trial, 99/mo', 60 dollars of Reddit ads on r/agency and r/marketing plus a disclosed post in two agency Slack groups, and tells Maya to measure priced-CTA clicks and post-reveal emails. It sets the line in advance: pass if 5 percent or more of cold visitors click the priced button, fail below 2 percent, and anything between means change the offer, not the product.

Prompt 2 · Audit your existing demand evidence the way a skeptical investor would.

Act as a skeptical seed investor. Here is every piece of demand evidence I have for my idea: [list everything: waitlist size, conversations, survey results, test results, pre-orders, community complaints]. Sort it into three buckets: proof I should say in a pitch, weak signal I should keep quiet about, and noise I should ignore entirely. For each item in the weak bucket, tell me the cheapest way to upgrade it into real proof this week.

What a good output looks like

For Maya it puts the 5 pre-payments and the 9 percent priced-CTA rate in the pitch bucket, moves the 412-person waitlist to keep-quiet with an upgrade path (email the list a real pre-order offer and report the conversion), and calls the 'every agency owner I showed it to loved it' line noise. It also flags that her survey saying 78 percent would pay is the weakest item on the list, because stated intent from warm contacts predicts almost nothing.

Key terms in this lesson

Read more

Takeaways

  • Investors discount politeness to zero. Compliments, surveys, and demo enthusiasm are not evidence.
  • A waitlist is a pool of people to test on, not proof. An email address costs nothing to give.
  • Evidence is ranked by cost: strangers taking a priced action beats conversion rates, which beat organic complaints. Everything else stays out of the pitch.
  • A smoke test or fake door test buys top-tier evidence in a week for under 100 dollars. Keep the price on the page or you learn nothing.
  • The winning answer has a denominator: N cold strangers saw a priced offer, X percent acted, Y paid.

Now run your own idea through it.

You have the method. Olune does the legwork: an honest build-or-kill verdict on live Reddit signals, competitor maps, and keyword volume, in about eight minutes. Free to start.

Common questions

Is a big waitlist really worth nothing in a pitch?

Not nothing, but far less than founders think, because joining costs the signup nothing. Its real value is as a test audience: email the list a genuine pre-order offer at a real price and report what fraction converts. That conversion number is pitchable. The raw total is not.

Is a fake door test ethical when the product does not exist?

Yes, if you are honest at the moment of the reveal. Tell people plainly that the product is launching soon, thank them, and offer the list or a discount for their trouble. If you take pre-order money, deliver or refund it, no exceptions. What is not ethical is the alternative many founders choose: raising money and spending a year building on evidence they never collected.

What conversion rate do investors actually want to see?

There is no magic number, and anyone who gives you one is guessing. What matters is that the rate comes from cold traffic, that the action had a price attached, and that you can defend the audience and channel it came from. As a rough guide, low single digits to a priced CTA is normal, 5 percent or better is worth saying out loud, and below 1 percent means fix the offer before you pitch.